On time and the wasting of it

Nothing will give you a better perspective on time than the wasting of it. The extra hour you slept in, the day that was unproductive and you still didn’t exercise, the dinner spent away from your kids because of poor planning. And when you’re on your own in a consultancy (or work from home or have a lot of autonomy), it can get even worse. You are the only master of your domain, which is as it should be, after all you are an adult.

Last week, my friend Rayanne wrote a little bit on how to be more productive, particularly on Mondays, which I found incredibly useful, as I was scrambling to complete proposals, finish content and have several meetings before leaving on a jet plane to TNL. I also saw a thread by my friend Amybeth Hale, which (and I’m paraphrasing here) expressed her frustration that many of her friends either intimated that she didn’t work or lobbed an insincere “Must be nice” her way when she explained what she did. I explained my personal feelings on the subject, which were I DO watch TV while I work, I spend many days working in my pajamas, I often have a glass of wine and prepare dinner at 4pm and then get back to work post-8pm. Others chimed in on their time management techniques as well. Lesson learned: Lots of us work from home and make the very best of it.

At TNL, Jason Seiden dropped the knowledge that we can’t actually “multi-task” (yes we can) which put a bit of a damper on my whole “watching TV while playing Spotify while facebooking while writing while doing the laundry shuffle” THING.

I’m just plain confused. See I’m the kind of girl who works best with a deadline, who can chart her stress level by the amount of assignments due

Ben Franklin's Schedule

and who measures success by the time it takes to do them as efficiently as possible.

Unfortunately for me, the world we live in doesn’t look like Ben Franklin’s anymore. But maybe it should. Perhaps time is what we make of it. Does being super productive mean producing less honest and GOOD work? This writer at Lifehacker is going to test that theory.

Awhile back, my good friend John Sumser insisted that I needed to schedule time during my day to think. I’m thinking he might have been correct. At least part of my New Year’s resolution will be to get off the grid, put my head down and start thinking more, creating more. Communication is fantastic and I love the added social dimension that blogging, tweeting, facebooking, pinning, tumbling and linkedin-in-ing have brought to my life. But I’m going to take time to read more, write more, think more and walk more. How about you?

You should read the post that this leads to as well…

Pay to Play?

I struggle with writing this. When I first started dabbling in social media, I got kicked in the face a number of times about how unprofessional it was and how it would never increase my earning power and all that mess and what I’m about to say seems like an iteration of that for a new generation. So please, as you read the following, keep in mind that I can be cranky, uninformed and wrong at times. I’m not a full-time journalist and I frequently shoot off at the mouth.

Everywhere I look lately, workplace functions are being turned into games. You can earn badges, complete levels, compete against your peers in this new gamification of…well, everything! I’m not sure about it. To be sure, applying for a job can be tedious, but is it necessary for me to endorse people I’ve never worked with to gain points? Do I need a badge (that someone just made up) in a virtual world to prove to employers that I am good at my job? There is not doubt that Rypple has been hugely successful in building collaborative work environments (their recent trial with Facebook proved that even the holy men of Silicon Valley think their product is worth using) and Branchout has garnered serious buzz and even more venture capital. But I worry about the ahem…ripple effect.

With potential employees, job seekers and candidates, as well as current employees being rewarded for various tasks and gaming becoming part of everything from scheduling to performance reviews, are we not creating the conditions for a bubble of our own? More and more demand to make tasks more rewarding or more fun just so people will DO them?

And what happens when we’re done being amateur recruiters, admins, performance junkies and we have to sit down and do the menial and mundane stuff of our everyday job? Will we? Does this sort of level by level reward and hype prepare people to operate at a strategic or executive level, where the rewards are longer-term and more abstract?

I’m curious and like I said at the beginning, probably wrong. I welcome your thoughts in the comments…if you’ve read this far.

Since when is work NOT personal?

Brad Pitt, cuz it's my blog

Since when is work NOT personal?

I finally blurted this out after a couple of days of listening to discussions around WHERE exactly to draw the line in sharing oneself online. Gen Y had a different take than Gen X, who felt differently than Boomers. Men had alternate viewpoints than women and of course, there was the interplay of different cultures and how they felt about it. As far as I could tell these were the commonalities.

- We all use social media in some form.

- We all work.

So the debate was “How personal is too personal when you’re trying to be professional?”

Is it okay to discuss a broken leg but not a broken marriage?

Can you slam a celebrity but not your boss?

Is miscarriage as okay as misappropriation of funds for a forum?

And instead of answering any of these, I thought (and said):

“Since when is work not personal?” We spend about a decade of our lives working for a living. Most of us are not independently wealthy but have been raised to at least attempt to do something we like, if not love. The advent of everyman use of technology has made us ever-present and always available and yet I STILL see articles and research about how Gen Y uses work email for personal. REALLY? This is an issue? When my boss can get a hold of me on a red-eye from London to Houston, we’re still talking about a 40 hour work week like it’s 1938.

I live a large part of my life online. I also happen to work online. Because I travel, I have formed a social circle that is not relegated to one region or time zone. We are increasingly connected to one another via this service, or that service, but mostly because we allow ourselves to be. Work (at least mine) is intensely personal, not just because it’s online, but because I take it very seriously and love what I do. I assume since many of the folks were at this unconference (TRULondon) and others I’ve attended, that they also care deeply about the recruiting profession and the larger but impacted working population which we claim to serve.

Work is Personal.

“Always make your work be personal. And then you never have to lie…” Francis Ford Coppola

Lonesome Dove is the best miniseries EVER, also marketing stuff

I just finished watching Lonesome Dove with Robert Duvall and Tommy Lee. If you haven’t watched, do so very soon. It was a great book and a great movie and there’s much wisdom to be gleaned from it. Also you might walk around talking like a cowboy for a few days (which I did) and your family might love it (which mine did NOT).

Here are some great quotes from the movie, followed by my thoughts on how they connect with the world of marketing and recruiting by the THINNEST of threads, but like a friend of mine recently said, this is my playground :)

You do more work than you ought to so it’s my obligation to do less: McCray says this to Call early on in the movie right after Call gets on him (which he does all the time) about being lazy and never doing his fair share of work. As the movie goes along you do see this as pretty much the case. But you also see that McCray and Call have fallen into a pattern, where they rely on one another to do exactly what they’ve always done. Lesson: Set expectations early and reevaluate often, lest you fall into an unhealthy pattern.

I won’t say I did and I won’t say I didn’t but I will tell you this, a man who wouldn’t cheat for a poke, doesn’t want it bad enough… Augustus (Gus) McCray says this to Lorena after he cuts cards with her for ummm, her favor after she decides to leave the “lady of the night” business. She laughingly accuses Gus of cheating to win some alone time with her and he responds with the above statement. Now he still pays her a more than fair wage for her services but makes it clear that he’ll do what he needs to literally stack the cards in his favor. Lesson: Working hard is part of the battle. Being prepared is another part. But showing you’ll do what it takes is the most important part. (Please watch yourself in the comments, only a simpleton will think that I am advocating cheating right now. If you are tempted to criticize, watch the movie and then come back and say it, I promise I’ll approve it.)

Jake’s always been too leaky a vessel for anyone to put much hope in….Gus says this to nearly everyone who’ll listen when Lorena (Lori) decides to rely on the unreliable but handsome charmer Jake to take her away from a life of prostitution to San Francisco. Gus is older than Jake and tries to dissuade the girl from a difficult journey and certain heartbreak, but she (nor anyone else at first) will really listen to him. Lesson: Check references and private opinion before doing business with folks. Public stuff means little nowadays.

Up north ain’t a place it’s a direction…. Rick Shroeder plays Newt, a supposed orphan who ends up being Call’s biological son. Here, he asks Call how long til they get up North? And Call answers, “Up north ain’t a place it’s a direction” and proceeds to list some of the landmarks they’ll pass to an awestruck Newt, who’s never seen beyond the borders of Texas. Later in the movie, the men keep going until Call stops and tells them they’ve arrived. Lesson: Stop trying to GET there. Just head in the right direction.

Well Woodrow, here’s where we find out if we was meant to be cowboys I reckon….Now Lonesome Dove was shot in the 80s and effects then weren’t what they are now but in this scene, the men have 2500 cattle, a band of several cowboys, a wagon, a cook that will only walk and they encounter a huge sandstorm. It’s looming up behind them and it’s the last thing Gus says to (Woodrow) Call before hitching up his bandana so it covers his face. Woodrow responds “I reckon.” See before this cattle drive from Texas to Montana (the premise of the story) the two men had been Texas Rangers and (sort of) ranchers. At the age of VERY OLD, they decided to undertake this difficult and dangerous idea (mostly Call’s idea) and at one of the first signs of adversity they see it as a qualifier. I love it! Lesson: Don’t go for the job you’re qualified for. Go for the one above that! (of course, a bunch of them DO die…)

SPOILER ALERT!

Not me… Gus dies and Call promises he’ll take him ALL the way back to Texas. When the undertaker offers to keep Gus’ body until better weather, he indicates that Call probably won’t come back as people often promise the dying all kinds of things they don’t get around to doing later. Call, in two words, explains that’s not the type of person he is. True to his word, he faces ridicule, danger, contempt, and frustration in the spring when he carries the body back down to Texas. He fights off vultures and nearly loses the body in a river when his wagon breaks, but he makes it back and keeps his promise. Lesson: Keep your promises, even when everyone thinks you’re a fool to do so.

Want more quotes? Here’s a whole parcel of ‘em :)

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,314 other followers